Avoiding Redundant Simulation Cycles with your UVM VIP based simulation with a Simple Save-Restore Strategy
Posted by paragg on 6th March 2014
In many verification environments, you reuse the same configuration cycles across different testcases. These cycles might involve writing and reading from different configuration and status registers, loading program memories, and other similar tasks to set up a DUT for the targeted stimulus. In many of these environments, the time taken during this configuration cycles are very long. Also, there is a lot of redundancy as the verification engineers have to run the same set of verified configuration cycles for different testcases leading to a loss in productivity. This is especially true for complex verification environments with multiple interfaces which require different components to be configured.
The Verilog language provides an option of saving the state of the design and the testbench at a particular point in time. You can restore the simulation to the same state and continue from there. This can be done by adding appropriate built in system calls from the Verilog code. VCS provides the same options from the Unified Command line Interpreter (UCLI).
However, it is not enough for you to restore simulation from the saved state. For different simulations, you may want to apply different random stimulus to the DUT. In the context of UVM, you would want to run different sequences from a saved state as show below.
In the above example apart from the last step which varies to large extent, the rest of the steps once established need no iterations.
Here we explain how to achieve the above strategy with the simple existing UBUS example available in the standard UVM installation. Simple changes are made in the environment to show what needs to be done to bring in this additional capability. Within the existing set of tests, the two namely, “test_read_modify_write” and “test_r8_w8_r4_w4”, differs only w.r.t the master sequence being executed – i.e. “read_modify_write_seq” and “r8_w8_r4_w4_seq” respectively.
Let’s say that we have a scenario where we would want to save a simulation once the reset_phase is done and then start executing different sequences post the reset_phase the restored simulations. To demonstrate a similar scenario through the UBUS tests, we introduced a delay in the reset_phase of the base test (in a real test, this may correspond to the PLL lock, DDR Initialization, Basic DUT Configuration).
The following snippet shows how the existing tests are modified to bring in the capability of running different tests in different ‘restored’ simulations.
As evident in the code we made two major modifications.
- Shifted the setting of the phase default_sequence from the build phase to the start of the main phase.
- Get the name of the sequence as an argument from the command-line and process the string appropriately in the code to execute the sequence on the relevant sequencer.
As you can see, the changes are kept to a minimum. With this, the above generic framework is ready to be simulated. In VCS, one of the different ways, the save/restore flow can be enabled as follows.
Thus above strategy helps in optimal utilization of the compute resources with simple changes in your verification flow. Hope this was useful and you manage to easily make the changes in your verification environment to adopt this flow and avoid redundant simulation cycles.
Posted in Automation, Coding Style, Configuration, Creating tests, Customization, Optimization/Performance, Organization, Reuse, Stimulus Generation, SystemVerilog, Tutorial, UVM, Uncategorized, Verification Planning & Management | 1 Comment »